Jim said;
A state bee program that was even providing free mite
treatments is clearly one that was spending more money than
would be prudent under the triple whammy of reduced tax income
due to the ongoing economic downturn, reduced federal money
available to the states, and increased numbers of "unfunded
mandates" (Federal regulations that force action by states,
but do not provide Federal funding to cover the expenses).

I did not know any state was handing out free mite treatments? If so how
long would a hive have to reside in a state to qualify?

Jim said:
Beekeepers are clearly a "special interest group", and without
a thriving set of pollination customers to complain that bee
inspection and extension services are mission-critical to THEIR
crops, they are the sole voice to explain their plight.

The USDA and many senators are well aware of beekeepers but as Jim says we
do not command many votes.

Jim said:
 Even our State Apiarist has a multi-purpose title - he is the "State
Apiarist" and the "Endangered Species Coordinator", a juxtaposition of roles
that I find eerily amusing, if not highly appropriate.

Endangered species should include beekeepers. Maybe we could get a section
of prime honey producing area given to us for our habitat?

Jim said;
Clearly, numbers matter, as votes tend to be the lingua franca of
government.

And aalso the numbers involved in donations !

Bob

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::