BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
allen dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Apr 2003 06:53:34 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
> Not cheap, but my refractometer from Bellingham + Stanley is superbly
> engineered.  The line is absolutely clear and it is easy to measure to
> within 1/4%.

Mine is twenty-five years old and measures to 0.1 % and has temperature
correction.  I thought that accuracy was pretty much standard.  Maybe
not.

That kind of accuracy is nice, and important if you are packing
commercially, but for most beekeepers who are shipping bulk and/or just
selling locally, the bubble test (described in the archives) is plenty
accurate.

Unless you are competing so hard that you are pressing the legal
moisture limit just to survive ( and pay for your Mercedes), as some
packers are, just being sure that unpasteurized honey is well under
17.8% is usually all we need to know.

If you check commercially packed honey, I think you will never find it
at a moisture level detectably below the legal limit.

Funny.  I wonder how they get so close...

allen
http://www.honeybeeworld.com

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2