BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Date:
Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:00:14 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
In-Reply-To:
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
yoonytoons wrote:
> While finishing sugar-dusting [my girls are kicking!], I could see why
> this method, with its proven efficacy, has failed catch up with the rest
> of the industry: tedium infinitum.

Unfortunately, sugar dusting is both effective and ineffective as shown
by tests. If I recall it is mostly the time of year that causes the
difference. The test was done by adding an ether roll after dusting and
where the dusting showed few mites, the roll showed many.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2