Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:18:55 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jim was right, review/decision by editor does not consitute peer review, which is
usually anonymous and by 2 or more other scientists.
ABJ does have one "Apicultural Research" section that IS peer reviewed. The
impact index (published by ISI {http://www.thomsonisi.com} to measure how often a
journal is cited by scientists) is rather low, of course, for this journal. But the fact that
it gets even listed by SCI is a pleasent surprise.
Zachary Huang
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 11:34:30 -0400, James Fischer wrote:
>> Actually many articles in ABJ are subjected by Joe for peer review.
>submitted. ABJ simply does not have a large enough pool of people who meet
>this criteria to be able to claim that they are "peer reviewed" in anywhere
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|