Sender: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 21 Jun 2002 11:21:51 -0700 |
Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII |
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
In-Reply-To: |
<007801c2193f$b1e67620$b3e5a1c6@notebook> |
Organization: |
Oregon VOS |
Comments: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
I can think of one good reason: the example it would set. People who saw
you do it but who were unaware of the difference between your non-viable
"truck stop" swarm and a real swarm might quit calling bee folks to
salvage swarms. "Nuke 'em, Jack. It's what bee keepers do, I saw 'em do
it once."
Even though the public doesn't know the details, they seem to be aware
that a swarm is something to be saved (and removed to a remote place.)
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Allen Dick wrote:
> If the bees are not to be saved, I'm wondering why you don't just use a
> garden sprayer with soapy water. The bees die instantly and there is no
> stinging, no need to climb, no disposal problem, and no bees left behind.
---------------
Richard Yarnell, SHAMBLES WORKSHOPS | No gimmick we try, no "scientific"
Beavercreek, OR. Makers of fine | fix we attempt, will save our planet
Wooden Canoes, The Stack(R) urban | until we reduce the population. Let's
composter, Raw Honey | leave our kids a decent place to live.
|
|
|