Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 7 Aug 2003 06:37:10 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Todd wrote: "It would seem that you portray plants as having far more
awareness, volition
and prescience than has ever been even suggested via scientific (and even
un-scientific) observation.
I'm as much in awe of the fabric of life as the next guy, but such lofty
pseudo-religious ascriptions seem a bit out of place here. Could we please
focus on the facts as we know them?"
However, I believe that Roger was poetically referring to the process of
evolution of the plants by survival of those plants that best utilized the
visits of the bees the best. Those that didn't have their stamens and
pistols most strategically placed so that bees would brush against them in
the process of harvesting the necter would have a much less of a chance of
reproducing. Those with the most kids, seeds, populates the world.
Mike
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|