BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: More on Cell Size
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 31 Jul 2002 06:47:20 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines) 
> Allen, I'd like to be sure that I understand the situation there.  Are
these
> bees that have *always* been on natural comb, or are they bees that might
> have been on foundation many years ago?

I don't know.

> > Also, as a follow-up on Joe and Oene's 4.9 experiment, Joe now reports
> > that the bees have made a mess of the 4.9 foundation...

> As I understand it, this is what the 4.9ers would predict..
> (Have I got that right?)

Yes.

allen
http://www.internode.net/honeybee/diary/

ATOM RSS1 RSS2