Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:36:01 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
One of the problems with the debate about bee "language" is
that the simple fact of the honeybees' dancing seems to
dazzle people. The whole thing makes for such a charming
story.
After reading Adrian Wenner's "Anatomy of a Controversy"
book, I asked myself - "Well, if bees don't dance to convey
location information to other bees, why do they dance?"
I think Professor Wenner and Dr Rosin are probably correct
- bees don't dance to convey location information. Odour
is the key. But their explanations for why the bees nevertheless
dance did not satisfy me. That is why I published this:
http://naturalscience.com/ns/articles/01-13/ns_jdo.html
On the matter of the value of the Internet in opening up
this debate, and the difficulties in getting anti-language
papers published, I could add that I wrote a follow-up to
the above paper. I was unable to get this published by the
same journal. The reasons given did not seem entirely
satisfactory to me. I suspect that there is a level of
censorship of anti-dance language thinking. The dance
"language" has become a "sacred cow" (excuse the mixed
metaphors) to which people are emotionally attached.
Julian O'Dea
Canberra, Australia
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|