BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Aug 2002 19:16:00 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
> 5. Your call as to whether queen supercedure is good in the middle of the
> main honey flow.  To hear some on this list, the replacement queen must
be
> inherently inferior since she developed and mated on her own.
Personally,
> I don't like the unplanned, several week shutdown of brood rearing.  But,
> I'm not convinced that the bees can't do as good a job as a queen
grafter.

This is what I was wondering about.

I gather that the original queen goes missing or fails completely, then?

Or, why the interruption.  I was thinking supercedure can happen while a
queen is continuing to lay, thus my question.

allen

ATOM RSS1 RSS2