Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: size
From:
Keith Malone <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:26:46 -0900
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Hi Stimey& All,

> Can anyone say cell size wasn't increased as an attempt to
> induce larger bees that would over winter better in northern regions.
>

I have never heard this discussed in the old beekeeping books I have. It was
an attempt to get the bees to forage on flowers nectar  that their tongues
could not reach and, so they thought, so they could carry more nectar back
to the hive.

I myself would think that A smaller bee would winter better. This I will
find out soon.

Not all animals in the north are larger, true some are but others are not.
For instance, our frogs up here in Alaska are pretty small. But our
mosquitoes are big enough to carry you away in some regions.

Keith Malone
Chugiak, Alaska USA
[log in to unmask]
http://takeoff.to/alaskahoney

Check out current weather in my area and 5 day forecast;
http://www.wx.com/myweather.cfm?ZIP=99654

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV