Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:30:41 -0500 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> It is his opinion that a mated queen subjected to
> cold temperatures will have permanent damage
> done to her ovaries resulting in infertility.
I recall something to that effect coming from a Penn State study when they
were trying to determine the conditions queens are subjected to when they
are shipped twixt there and here. When I first read, "reference was to
temperatures below
70 degrees Fahrenheit", I thought, "That could only happen in shipping." As
others have observed, a queen would never get that cold in a colony. Cold
day mating flight? Doubtful she'd fly.
Anyway, I don't recall exactly the Penn State study (it was done in the
Jennifer Findley days), but there was documented a definite cause and effect
of cold on queen performance, but I seem to recall that the cause was more
extreme (temperatures far below 70dF) and am not sure the effect was total
infertility; I think it was more along the lines of poor performance and
quick supersedure.
Aaron Morris - thinking baby it's cold outside!
|
|
|