BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Dee Lusby <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Mar 2002 20:12:07 -0800
In-Reply-To:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (38 lines)
Hi to all on Bee-L

I am finding this discussion of salvaging wax and honey
very good. However, I do have a question I hope someone can
help me with.

I now what pretty wax is to look at. I also know that many
beekeepers consider the lighter the color the wax when
processed, the cleaner it is.

But is this so, and is this true?

Is pretty yellow and whiter wax really clean or just
pretty. Could it be that residue wax is really cleaner,
though darker looking at times?

How would one rate clean as chemical or residue clean vs
clean by nice looks? and How should the difference be rated
for marketing?

How does one salvage clean wax then that is pretty and
residue clean also? Is anyone doing this?

How is apistan and coumaphous gotten out, or anything else
for that matter? What are some of you doing for this
problem or aren't you?

Just curious.

Regards,

Dee A. Lusby

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - sign up for Fantasy Baseball
http://sports.yahoo.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2