BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 13 Jun 2002 07:20:11 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (34 lines)
Excerpts from:
American Bee Research Conference
Originally published in The Speedy Bee, March, April, June 1998
(Vols. 3, Nos. 3,4,6)

>Sponsored by the American Association of Professional Apiculturists,
>the ABRC has become an important way for scientists to exchange
>information among themselves, and at the same time, share their
>results with the beekeeping community.
>
>the majority of ABRC presentations were applied in nature
>
>-- --  and -- -- shared their views on the pressures that
>researchers face. These boil down to two major issues. Researchers
>get little credit at their institutions for publishing in lay
>journals. Money runs the research establishment; big grants are
>funded by national institutions in basic research. Those trying to
>do applied research face extremely limited budgets and little
>support from colleagues.
>
>-- --  in his opening statement said that research does not help
>commercial beekeepers. In addition, he concluded that information on
>pollination is not up to date and was necessary in these times when
>many beekeepers were going out of business.

Here is a respected commercial beekeeper saying point blank:
"research does not help commercial beekeepers". I have heard this
many times.


--

Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2