BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Sep 2002 17:23:24 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Murray McGregor said:

> Your scenario relies on the assumption that resistance is the only
> variable at play and this is simply incorrect. Most cases are down to
> inefficiency and inconsistency of the delivery system of the treatment.
> Genetic difference is certainly a possibility, but not as you indicate,
> a certainty.

> Resistance is certainly selected for, but to say that exposure to
> treatment gives rise to new strains automatically is a leap too far.

A very good point.  I should not have used the word "certainly" and/or
should have added a qualification, such as "over time", "over multiple
treatment periods", or "on average over a large number of colonies".

        jim

ATOM RSS1 RSS2