BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
Re: Contaminants in wax
From:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Fri, 3 Aug 2001 09:41:30 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines) 
In a message dated 8/3/01 9:24:53 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

> Example:  In the United Kingdom, and I may suggest, pretty soon in all the
EC,
>  the law is ZERO level for contaminants in honey.
I suppose it will be determined by the method used to measure contaminants.
Parts per million?
Parts per billion?
Parts per Quadrillion?

As technology advances we have the ability to detect far smaller amounts and
I would imagine that no honey on this planet could pass if the standard was
detectable contaminant.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2