Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Does research really want to know?
From:
Jerry J Bromenshenk <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 12 Jun 2002 08:32:35 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Al said:
>Too many "researchers" have shown up with "the one true cure" for
>something and had their prescriptions found lacking.

I'd argue that a true researcher will never tout a cure - research is based
on probability (what's the chance of the finding being due to a mistake,
error, or artifact?).  That's why we use statistics, repeat experiments,
and use controls.  That also takes time, something a person with a problem
doesn't have - time to wait for a "proven" solution.  And even in the best
of cases, new information may change the whole issue. Be wary of anyone
proclaiming themselves an expert with the magic bullet.  If it really
works, the data will speak for itself.

Cheers

Jerry
Jerry J. Bromenshenk
[log in to unmask]
http://www.umt.edu/biology/bees

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV