Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 3 May 2001 07:11:08 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
This message was originally submitted by [log in to unmask] to the BEE-L list at
LISTSERV.ALBANY.EDU. It was edited to remove the entirety of a previous
submission.
----------------- Original message (ID=1A46F99F) (69 lines)
-------------------
Date: Wed, 02 May 2001 16:05:20 -0800
From: Tom Elliott <[log in to unmask]>
To: Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology
<[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Marking existing queens
Vital,
Since you referenced my post I will simply respond that I have marked
queens at various times of the year (keep in mind that here in Alaska
our season is short) and never had a negative reaction. I am erratic
about marking queens so I sometimes do not, and other times do it when
ever I get to it.
Also I have never marked more than 4 queens at any one time so I never
worried about queen odor on my fingers. In any case, I hold the queen
only by the wings, so odor would be less of a problem (if it is a
problem).
I have never clipped queens, and see no value to such a process. My
reading suggests that a clipped queen is more likely to be superseded
early than non clipped queens. I do not have any reference for that,
but perhaps someone else here will set me straight.
--
"Test everything. Hold on to the good." (1 Thessalonians 5:21)
Tom Elliott
Chugiak, Alaska
U.S.A.
[log in to unmask]
|
|
|