BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Mime-version:
1.0
Date:
Sat, 14 Oct 2000 16:44:07 -0500
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Content-type:
text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Subject:
From:
Barry Birkey <[log in to unmask]>
In-Reply-To:
Content-transfer-encoding:
7bit
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> used.  A quick glance reveals that the ratio varies from around 15:1 to
> infinity:1.  Several hive groups that gave zero results from sugar shake
> subsequently yielded mites in the hundreds.

If indeed these were accurate counts, this would prove to me just how
unreliable and basically useless the sugar roll test is. I can get a more
reliable test just by opening a few drone cells.

-Barry

--
www.beesource.com
www.bee-l.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2