Hi, George Imirie.  I'm still struggling to understand
your position.  You regard the current use of TM to
result in more AFB in the Country than would exist if
it was not used.  So why didn't the period between
1922 and WW II when no TM or sulfa were availalbe
result in AFB prevelance as low as now or even lower?
Why were bseekeepers (including yourself?) inclined to
use sulfa when it became available and, later, TM?  Dan

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Shopping - Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products.
http://shopping.yahoo.com/