Content-Transfer-Encoding: |
7bit |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Sun, 15 Jul 2001 17:13:10 +0100 |
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" |
MIME-Version: |
1.0 |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi all
A clip from Bill's post
> Might the difference in cell size (and bee) be due to the climate each
> inhabits? Survival would seem to dictate a smaller bee in hotter
> climates and a larger one in cold or temperate climates
I was thinking that the high altitude Montecola would represent the largest
possibiliy in body size, as it lives at the highest altitude and in a
climate that drops below freezing almost, if not, every night.
As Montecola inhabits a 5.0 cell at low level and 5.1 cells at high
altitude, without any influence from foundation, my thoughts were that
temperate bees would range from 4.83 ish - 5.08 ish and Barry's scuts being
the hottest conditions would occupy 4.3 up to 4.8 ish. The numbers may not
be very precise but they follow a trend.
As bodysize increases the surface are to volume ratio of the individual bee
decreases causing less heat loss, but the other side of this is that smaller
cells allow a closer packing density allowing a higher number of bodies
generating heat, by metabolism, in a given volume. There should be an
equilibrium between these two sets of circumstances , but I do not know
where it lies.
Regards From:- Dave Cushman, G8MZY
Beekeeping and Bee Breeding, http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman
IBList Archives, http://website.lineone.net/~d.cushman
|
|
|