Skip Navigational Links
LISTSERV email list manager
LISTSERV - COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
LISTSERV Menu
Log In
Log In
LISTSERV 17.5 Help - BEE-L Archives
LISTSERV Archives
LISTSERV Archives
Search Archives
Search Archives
Register
Register
Log In
Log In

BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Menu
LISTSERV Archives LISTSERV Archives
BEE-L Home BEE-L Home

Log In Log In
Register Register

Subscribe or Unsubscribe Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Search Archives Search Archives
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: drone trapping
From:
[log in to unmask]
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 4 Jun 2001 19:34:47 EDT
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
Bill,
In simple ASPIRIN statements:

Drone brood trapping is a part of the new IPM theory.  Because the gestation
time for a drone is 24 days, 3 days longer than worker brood gestation, it
would appear that the female mite prefers to lay her mite eggs with drone
larva rather than worker larva, hence providing more food for her mite
progeny as well as perhaps more mites per bee cell than a worker bee cell.
Hence, by entering one frame of drone size foundation into a brood nest and
removing it BEFORE the drones emerge would badly deplete the Varroa
population of a colony.

Is that "declared simply" enough?

George Imirie

ATOM RSS1 RSS2

COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM CataList Email List Search Powered by LISTSERV