Allen Dick wrote:
> Oftentimes the results of such tests are stated as having 95% probability of
> being true.  That leaves a meaningful chance that reality of the situation
> slipped the net and the truth is still -- out there.

Which is why they have to be reproducable by others. No problem with
what you say.

My point is that they will be more accurate than either of the two
trials mentioned where the variables are not controlled, especially the
mite load.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, ME