BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date:
Fri, 16 Jun 2000 15:02:34 -0400
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
"the good, the bad, and the ugly"
From:
tomas mozer <[log in to unmask]>
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Comments:
cc: [log in to unmask]
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines) 
3 stories in the mainstream usa media of late, posted (with editorial
comment) for information/discussion purposes only...

the good: "Bitten but Not Stung By Beekeeping's Lure"
http://washingtonpost.com:80/wp-dyn/articles/A61657-2000Jun15.html

the bad: "Mite problem affects beekeepers unevenly"
http://web.philly.com:80/content/inquirer/2000/06/12/city/EBEEZ12.htm

the ugly: "No Killer Bees in All-Out Attack at Fullerton Duplex"
http://www.latimes.com:80/editions/orange/ocnews/20000616/t000057109.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2