Mime-Version: |
1.0 |
Sender: |
|
Subject: |
|
From: |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:26:50 -0500 |
In-Reply-To: |
|
Content-Type: |
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed |
Reply-To: |
|
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Bob, I did leave out the state name and the inspector's name, only because
it was a verbal report and it's important to keep the facts 100%
straight. I saw the inspector again today, and emailed them last night
with detailed questions and answers. I am the webmaster of the state
beekeepers association and within a week of the discovery, our website
should have the details about the incident.
I've not been successful in searching the archives using keywords. What is
the procedure for doing this?
At 07:39 AM 4/18/01 -0500, you wrote:
>I saw my first fluvalinate resistant mites four years ago. I expect to see
>Coumaphos resistant mites this year. I expect the same trouble convincing
>beekeepers of the Coumaphos resistant mites as I have had the last four
>years convincing beekeepers of fluvalinate resistant mites. Varroa is going
>to get harder to control. Many *bee-havers* are going to quit beekeeping or
>be content with buying packages each spring. I notice you left the name of
>your state inspector and your state out of the post. Both of you need to
>search the Bee-L archives for information on resistant mites. Use resistant
>mites and my name in the search. Now is my busy time so I haven't got time
>to go over such a complicated subject ( which is in archives) but will try
>to address new concerns.
>Sincerely,
>Bob Harrison
>Odessa, Missouri
|
|
|