BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
John Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 16 Jul 1999 23:18:58 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
John Burgess <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
Ted Fischer wrote: <  It just seems logical to me that resistance to Apistan
developed
> independently in this one colony

To me it seems illogical that resistance to Apistan would have developed in
only one colony, if you treated all your colonies in the same way.
Isn't it more likely that the colony in question has robbed out a heavily
infested feral colony which was on the point of collapse?
You could confirm by re-treating with Apistan and then checking for the
presence or absence of mites, rather than plunging straight into coumaphos.
Using a insert on the floor of the hive and examining daily for dead mites
would give a quick indication of whether or not significant resistance has
developed.

John Burgess, Editor Gwenynwyr Cymru/The Welsh Beekeeper
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2