BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Computer Software Solutions Ltd <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Feb 2000 01:12:45 GMT
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
Hello All

The debate on the use of Bayvarol/Apistan versus ecologically benign
treatments for varroa has proceeded apace since the mite has appeared in
various parts of the world.

Many claims have been made for various non-acaricide treatments and many of
these treatments have failed the tests required.

I would like to pose a simple question.

Can any body or hopefully many persons tell us that they have managed to use
non Bayvarol/Apistan controls on their bees over the past number of years
and that they can state that their bee hives have enjoyed continual health.?

Sincerely

Tom Barrett
49 South Park Foxrock
Dublin 18
Ireland

ATOM RSS1 RSS2