LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrea Eastman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 11 Dec 2000 14:47:07 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (104 lines)
This is syndicated, so it is appearing in newspapers all across the USA.

The author's email address is at the end of the article.

Sincerely,
Andrea
--
Andrea Eastman, MA, IBCLC
Granville, Ohio
mailto:[log in to unmask]


*******



UNICEF's deadly mission is killing children
By Michelle Malkin

"BREAST IS BEST." No, it’s not the new slogan for Hooters restaurant.
It’s the mantra of breast-feeding advocates who promote their cause with
a cult-like fervor around the world. Their extremism must be condemned.

I have nothing against breast-feeding. After weighing the pros and cons,
I’ve been nursing my five-and-a-half-month-old daughter since birth.
Mother’s milk offers my baby health benefits that man-made substitutes
can’t match. But in the hands of the United Nations Children’s Fund, the
breast-feeding crusade is killing the children it’s supposed to protect.

In a horrific investigative report published in the Wall Street Journal
this week, reporters Alix M. Freedman and Steve Stecklow expose UNICEF’s
homicidal mission to discourage AIDS-positive mothers from switching to
infant formula. The United Nations’ own statistics show that an
estimated 3.4 million children have contracted AIDS from their mothers
and died of the disease. Between 1.1 million and 1.7 million of those
children, mostly in Africa, are believed to have been infected with HIV
through breast-feeding.

There is a very simple solution: feed the babies formula. Top
manufacturers Nestle and Wyeth are ready and willing to provide tons of
tins of free formula to poor women in sub-Saharan Africa, the Journal
reports, but UNICEF adamantly refuses to support their offers.

The agency’s health bureaucrats wield great influence in the Third
World. The head office in New York is led by anti-corporate activists
who care more about sending political messages to formula makers than
about sending life-saving nourishment to babies in jeopardy. UNICEF’s
grudge dates back to the 1970s, when breast-feeding extremists began a
boycott of Nestle and other companies.

The protestors believe the formula makers "exploit" underprivileged
women in developing nations by creating a "dependency" on infant
formula.

The companies can’t win. When they try to sell their products abroad,
they’re accused of profiteering. When they try to give their goods away,
they’re accused of public-relations gimmickry. The Journal reports that
UNICEF executive director Carol Bellamy, a former New York City Council
president, angrily rebuffed efforts by Nestle to assist HIV-infected
mothers. Wyeth’s offer in 1998 to donate tons of free formula to African
hospitals was scrapped when company officials simply asked UNICEF not to
badmouth them publicly.

Bellamy instead insists that the major formula makers comply with an
inane U.N. regulatory code – passed long before AIDS hit Africa – which
bans the distribution of free and low-cost formula. Ayn Rand couldn’t
make this up. UNICEF would rather throw millions of dollars worth of
formula out with the babies, than undercut collective support for what
they consider a morally superior choice to breast-feed.

Rather than accept free infant formula and save lives immediately,
UNICEF recommends that African women with AIDS allow their babies to
breast-feed from other women. But there’s a good chance that the babies
will simply be getting infected milk from another woman. One UNICEF
official blithely supports pasteurized milk as an alternative when
mothers contract AIDS. But babies don’t usually begin drinking cow’s
milk until after one year. Without formula, mothers turn to dangerous
substitutes such as sugar water and rice water.

UNICEF’s lieutenants in the breast-feeding camp continue to attack
formula as unsafe and unhealthy. But in the developing world,
iron-fortified formula is often superior to the milk of sick,
malnourished women. Here in the West, we enjoy the comforts of fresh
fruits and vegetables, multivitamins, and folic acid supplements – not
to mention fancy electric pumps, bottles, and refrigerators to store
breast milk safely when we have to separate from our babies.

In sub-Saharan Africa, mothers are lucky to eat a half-cup of rice per
day – and must often work all day, away from their children, without the
luxury of nannies, wet nurses, and basic health amenities. Nevertheless,
UNICEF executive director Carol Bellamy, told the Journal reporters:
""We continue to advocate that breast is best."

Even if it kills.

Michelle Malkin writes for Creators Syndicate and can be reached at
[log in to unmask]

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2