> Gonneke: that sort of timing of feeds wasn't what was implied. You were
> merely noting down the time - ie the 'o'clock' - of the feeds, not their
> length, and anyway,  not with a view to changing what was happening, or
> judging if it was ok or not....it was more your own mini-research project
> where n=1 : )

Yes, and that ever before I ever dreamt of being a lactation consultant or doing
any kind of research whatsoever. Must have had an inquiring mind by then yet
:-))
I *did* write down the time the feeds took, as well as the time she spent
sleeping and crying and being awake, but indeed did not act upon the outcomes.

Well, as a matter of fact I was teasing a bit with my post, but I do find it
great of you have such strong opinions and stick to them, not stubbornly, but
with good arguments and offering food for though for everyone who reads it.

Gonneke

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html