LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Jennifer Tow, IBCLC" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Apr 2005 22:05:20 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (164 lines)
You may have already addressed all of these things, but here goes:

When I see a baby with what appears to be extensive food sensitivity, I 
find it is absolutely essential to look at the mother's nutritional 
profile. It is almost always the case that these mothers have permeable 
guts and to heal the baby requires that we heal the mother. It is 
important to evaluate the mother's diet before, during and after 
pregnancy--looking especially at foods she herself had allergic 
symptoms to (most moms who say they have no food allergies, actually 
have many symptoms they consider normal, like constipation, congestion 
and skin conditions). I also look at any condition the mother considers 
normal as part of the bigger picture, in conjunction with those she may 
consider problematic, such as overweight or underweight, diabetes, 
depression and others that often find their origin in poor gut functon. 
I have a group of health care practitoners I can refer to if I need 
them (a naturopath, homeopath, chiropractor and 
herbalist/nutritionist), but I usually begin with suggesting the mom 
make basic changes like adding esstial fatty acids to her diet, adding 
green foods, eliminating all trans fats and so on. Adding a probiotc is 
often essential.

What troubles me so much about your post is that the doc wants to use 
Neocate before he tries anything "invasive". AIM is horrendously 
invasive to the human infant!!! In addition to the baove, i would go 
over the mother's elimination diet thoroughly to evaluate ingredients 
and be sure she is eliminating ALL of the suspected foods. Often, moms 
are not and don't realize it.

BTW, the ped's request that the mom eat fruit, veggies, fish and 
chicken seems to me like a stab in the dark. If the baby is allergic to 
eggs, he is potentially allergic to chicken and fish is so highly 
contaminated that this is a very poor choice. The mom needs healthy 
fats in her diet and a lot of fruits and veggies. I get the sense that 
she did not eat a healthy diet, but relied too much on protein foods to 
the exclusion of foods rich in phytonutrients and EFAs. I do not have 
notes in front of me, but there is a migration of gut cells to the 
mother's breasts during pregnancy and those cells are involved in 
immune function of the breasts. So, I would conjecture that there is 
significant relationship between the mother's gut health and this kind 
of allergic response in infants.

All of that said, I think the answer lies in much more CST. A baby 
whose oral structure is so taught suggests rigidity throughout the 
system and he may be unable to shift from sympathetic to 
parasympathetic function, which means he cannot digest food properly. 
Proper tongue and cranial funtion, motilty of the diaphragm and the 
Pyloric sphincter are essential to his gut function and can be healed 
with CST. His birth was very traumatic and colic is most often related 
to imjury in the nervous system that CST can heal. I find that food 
allergies often resolve when CST is employed, although I think that 
during the healing process, removing the irritants is very important.. 
Be sure that the CST is trained in pediatrics and has a knowledge of 
oral function and gut function. And, I think that the mother needs to 
make changes in her diet anyway.
Jennifer Tow, IBCLC, CT, USA

-----Original Message-----
From: Kathryn Ward <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent:         Tue, 5 Apr 2005 20:45:48 -0400
Subject: Puzzling Case

   Dear Lactnetters,

I'd like to get your thoughts on the following case, with the mom's 
permission.
The baby has now seen at least 4 different lactation consultants and a 
few LLL
leaders, not to mention an OT/CST, besides the pediatrician.  Over the 
past 71/2
wks. he has gone from not latching at all to at least latching well on 
the right
breast.  Still having fits with the left.  Mom is most concerned about 
blood in
the stool.  Here's the summary:

7  1/2 wk old infant, gaining weight, well hydrated, normal amount of 
wet and
poopy diapers, appetite is fine, no fever.
   a.. cries beginning halfway through feeding and continues after 
feeding until
you can calm him down like a Reflux baby would
  b.. cries when having gas or bowel movement
  c.. bowels are now dark green, streaked with blood and mucous
  d.. nasal congestion
  e.. Doctor ran tests on stool for inflammation due to bacteria or
allergies--came back negative
  f.. Doc then consulted a  Ped. G.I. who feels that it's an allergy to
something in breastmilk and would like to try Neocate predigested 
formula before
doing more invasive tests such as endoscopic procedures
   g.. OT/CST saw him last week for "colicky" symptoms and latch 
difficulty.
Couldn't even get her finger in his mouth because he was so fussy.  Did 
some
other work to loosen his left side. He had not been turning his head to 
his
left, but now he can.  He has a very small, tight, clampy latch.
   h.. Mom has eliminated soy, dairy, and peanuts for at least 2/12 
weeks (added
back in Parmesan cheese without making a difference.)  Starting  
yesterday, the
ped asked her to eat only fruits, veggies, chicken, and fish.  No 
grains.  No
nuts or olive oil.
   i.. She had gestational diabetes and was very faithful to the diet, 
which
involved huge amounts of protein.  Since mom is mostly vegetarian, that 
mean a
lot of nuts and peanut butter, with fish. Very limited fruits and carbs.
   j.. Labor was long, with epidural and pitocin.  Mom thinks she may 
have had
antibiotics due to water being broken for a long time.

Mom really doesn't necessarily want to introduce formula, but feels she 
would if
that would "fix" the problem somehow.   She is very worried about the 
more
invasive procedures because the baby is already to miserable, and has 
spent so
much time being poked and prodded since birth.

Her question is what is causing the baby to need something other than 
breastmilk
to begin with, and would formula really be the answer in the long run?  
Will it
help pinpoint what it is in her milk (if anything) that the baby is 
allergic to?
Mom plans to pump even if she uses formula, and the ped said she could
reintroduce it slowly after 3-7 days.

Have you ever heard of a similar situation, and do you have any 
additional
insights?  I have checked the archives already.

Thanks so much!
Kathryn Ward, IBCLC

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

    

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2