LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Jacquie and Tim Nutt <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 19 Jul 2001 17:48:46 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Mandy, you have brought up a valid point, particularly with the possibility
of milk being produced from transgenic herds.  I wish that breastfeeding was
seen as more than mere nutrition, but as a finely tuned delivery process
benefitting mother and baby in numerous ways.

On the other hand, I don't see the term "breast milk" being usurped.  There
is nothing that can be called breast milk, and this covers moms who are
doing the second best thing, feeding pumped milk.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mandy O'Reilly <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:02 AM
Subject: breastfeeding versus breastmilk


> Dear All
>
> I have been thinking about the required labelling on formula cans stating
> that breastmilk is best for babies. Thats good but I wonder if the term
> should be breastfeeding or breastmilk or both. Does the use of the word
> breastmilk make it too easy for the formula manufacturers to intimate that
> their product is as good as the breastmilk product? Would the difference
in
> wording place different empahsis on breastfeeding to women? Would be
> interested in comments.
>
> Kind Regards
>
> Mandy O'Reilly
> IBCLC
>

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2