LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 29 Mar 1998 08:30:00 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (53 lines)
At 11:52 PM 3/28/98 -0500, Kathy B. wrote:
>Hi there. Did you try a
>
>Search * in Lactnet where sender contains Hale

Kathy, I am obviously making some "teeny, weeny" mistake in trying to
search for senders.

To test your above directions, I sent first this message:

search in lactnet where sender contains hale

There were no matches.

Then I decided that the * was what was needed. In order to make the search
simple, I used "fabisch" because she had just sent a post. I sent:

> search * in lactnet where sender contains fabisch
-> No match.

So, I sent:

search * in lactnet where sender contains hale.

I got a match.  But only 2 for Hale. Is it possible that Dr. Hale
personally sent only 2 posts in 1997?

> search * in lactnet where sender contains hale
-> 2 matches.

Item #   Date   Time  Recs   Subject
------   ----   ----  ----   -------
020430 98/02/25 21:41   26   Cup Feeding
020577 98/02/28 13:40   20   Engorgement Protocol

Well, I finally did the "ultimate."  I sent:

search * in lactnet where sender contains gima

Here's what was sent:

> search * in lactnet where sender contains gima
-> 447 matches (only the first 100 will be shown).

Rather embarrassing. So, what's with Hale?  Why only 2?  I remember that
sometimes he posts through someone else; is that the problem?

Patricia Gima, IBCLC
Milwaukee


mailto:[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2