LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Pamela Morrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 16:10:19 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (143 lines)
Dear all

Thank you to so many who wrote in with stories 
and observations of what babies may be fed in 
bottles when mothers don't have access to free 
formula.  Virginia, your history lesson was 
particularly fascinating.  I guess what I'm still 
trying to get at is not whether babies in the 
Phillipines receive mixtures of corn-flour, or 
coffee creamer instead of breastmilk, nor whether 
babies in Zambia receive Fanta.  That one really 
made me shudder, breastfeeding is the cultural 
norm in Zambia - or was - until the first Zambian 
HIV & Infant Feeding Counsellors were trained in 
1999 ....  I also hear the carefully researched 
facts that babies in Australia and UK used to 
receive all sorts of inappropriate mixtures.   I 
wasn't quite sure what you were saying Dawn, 
about the economic downturn and an intention to 
take cans of formula to the next county meeting 
.... Logically, increasing poverty should 
stimulate higher rates of breastfeeding since 
breastmilk is a really low-cost, renewable 
resource which frees mothers' scarce financial 
reserves for other things.  Julie, thanks for 
your further input confirming the sad cases you 
worked with, and mothers in real poverty.  I 
still tend to agree with Nikki who says "We can't afford not to breastfeed."

What I'd still like to know is whether there is 
any current research to justify the wholesale 
handing out of free formula in a concerted way by 
governments and/or national health departments in 
_industrialized_ countries in 2009 to the poorest 
mothers to _justify_ the current policy of doing so.

For instance, the British Healthy Start programme 
allows low income mothers to qualify for 
vouchers/tokens to the value of £6 per week which 
they can exchange in shops for fruit, vegetables 
or milk.  They can, if they wish, save up the 
vouchers during their pregnancies and cash them 
all in after the birth, and they can use the 
vouchers to obtain free formula, rather than the 
fruit, veg or ordinary milk.  For non-breastfed 
children under 1 year, the token may be used for 
900g of infant formula milk per week instead. No 
application is necessary; as long as the Inland 
Revenue has up-to-date details about the family, 
any award under this scheme is automatic.  I'm 
not sure if this is a way that the Department of 
Health can distance itself from what is 
happening, but it has the effect that low-income 
mothers don't even need to go near a healthcare 
provider if they have already decided to formula-feed.

I believe that there are similar provisions in 
the US WIC scheme.  At the same time, I know that 
there are many dedicated breastfeeding 
counsellors and IBCLCs working hard in government 
departments to assist mothers to breastfeed, but 
nevertheless, the choice of whether to breastfeed 
or not is the mother's, and if she chooses the 
latter she is actually _helped_ to do so by her government.

That governments and health departments should 
continue facilitating formula-feeding of the 
babies of the poorest mothers is what bothers 
me.  These babies will be disadvantaged all their 
lives, and are the ones who most need 
breastmilk.  Heather makes some good points that 
making gifts of formula doesn't guarantee good 
mothering.  In fact, we have research to show 
that breastfeeding facilitates protective 
mothering.  So is there a body of researched fact 
to justify continued freebies?  Or is it all 
about commercial interests?  Or is it just habit 
- because we've been providing handouts for xxxx 
number of years and are afraid to stop _in case_ mothers starve their babies?

Part of my interest in this is due to the 
parallels I see between what happens in the US 
and UK and how the practice of free formula 
handouts for "needy" (HIV+) mothers is being 
exported to resource-poor countries, with pretty 
dismal consequences.  It's as if the 
industrialized world has set the precedent for 
what should happen, and endorsed its 
rightness.  Botswana provides a really chilling 
example of the consequences.  In 1999, their 
breastfeeding initiation rates were 95%.  Then 
the government introduced a policy of providing 
free formula for all HIV+ mothers.  By 2006 only 
65% of Botswana mothers even initiated 
breastfeeding (a drop of 30% in 7 years) and many 
more weaned their babies from the breast 
prematurely. Early in 2006 it was found that over 
500 formula-fed babies had died of diarrhoeal 
infections caused by contaminated water.  One 
village lost a full third of its babies. An 
investigation was conducted by the CDC who found 
that 15% of uninfected mothers were also 
formula-feeding.  So provision of free formula by 
the government had caused considerable spillover 
to mothers who didn't "need" it at all, but 
nevertheless had "chosen" to formula-feed.  And 
the normal practice or breastfeeding has been 
seriously eroded.  Similar situations are 
occurring up and down the length of sub-Saharan 
Africa, so things will only get worse.

We have libraries of research to show that health 
outcomes for breastfed babies are consistently 
better than health outcomes for formula-fed 
babies.  Or to show that formula-feeding is risky 
in all but the rarest of individual circumstances 
compared to breastfeeding, depending on how we 
want to characterize what is happening.   We have 
the Code to prevent the inappropriate marketing 
of breastmilk substitutes to parents.  But what 
do we have to protect babies from the 
inappropriate gifts of governments??   Where is 
the actual research to justify the gifts?  Having 
spent all but 12 years of my life in the poorest 
countries, I can't get my head around a system 
that doesn't expect that mothers will care for 
their babies enough to feed them the best way 
they can, even in the most limited circumstances.

Pamela Morrison IBCLC
Rustington, England 

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2