LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Arly Helm <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Oct 1995 20:01:58 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Is the only difference if one uses a
>milk based formula (that is NOT hypoallergenic) nutrition?

The fat is entirely different.  The carbohydrate is somewhat different.
The protein is the same, but reduced in amount (some formulas change the
proportion of casein:whey).  Some minerals are reduced, some micronutrients
are increased.
>
>Now, what about diabetes?  Isn't it early introduction of cow's milk that
>they link it to?  If so, why can't they say cow's milk based formulas pose
>the identical risk?

Cow's milk-based formulas do pose the identical risk as far as diabetes.  I
know of a researcher in the dairy/nutrition field who is trying to create a
formula in which the particular offending protein has been filtered out.

Arly


[log in to unmask] (Arly Helm, MS, CLE, IBCLC)

ATOM RSS1 RSS2