LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Emily Lindsey <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 May 2006 11:46:45 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Okay so this is going to sound so naive however I am going to ask the 
questions anyways for fear of being run out of town! Our scales are so 
expensive and supposedly are the best for accuracy, etc. However, I spent 
many years working with animals (my ranch and professionally) and we used 
to use very good animal digital scales to see how much a lamb or piglet had 
taken quite often. They lose so much when givena bottle as it is so un-
natural for them for the first couple feeds at least (hmmm kind of like the 
babies i work with now), it can be very important. So, the question is, 
these nice scales are in the 50-200 dollar range, do we have any proof that 
these are less efficient? they are as reliable for small animals in our 
babies range, so why not??? anyone tried this, or do this that wants to 
admit it? thought i would ask...

Emily Lindsey, BSPsy, CLE

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2