Thank you so much for posting this.  In case there are any who are wondering...This decision is from the 5th Circuit.  What one Circuit Ct. (federal ct.) decides is not binding law on other circuits, but it is considered "persuasive" when the other circuits are making their decisions.  I am happy to note that the 5th Circuit's decision was unanimous.
On Jun 11, 2013, at 12:00 AM, LACTNET automatic digest system <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Date:    Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:56:09 -0500
> From:    Brandy Hansen <[log in to unmask]>
> Subject: Whoa... lactation discrimination acknowledged as *actual* discrimination
> 
> Haven't seen anyone post this yet, but it's something everyone should see;
> somehow seems to have slipped by most news outlets so far, yes?
> 
> http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/5-31-13a.cfm?goback=.gde_50303_member_245848990
> 
> Was extremely disappointed at the original ruling last year... glad the


             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome