Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 25 Apr 2000 06:53:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
>I humbly disagree with the comment that referring to short nursings
>as "snacks" is inappropriate. As with so many things, it's the
>context.
I missed the beginning of this thread re: "snacking." Just wanted to let
folks who are not aware of it know that this is a 'code' word in
Babywise/Prep followers (used to justify forced schedules), so one might
want to consider whether the mother to whom they are talking is vulnerable
to BW/Prep when considering using this analogy. "Context" is also a buzz
word in GFI-land, imbued with different meaning to them than irl, so
there's some humor in your statement, Winnie:-)
>I may ask her how she would feel if someone told her she could only have
the >10-course dinners, nothing at any other time. I may also point out
that without >outside influences <snip> most adults wouldn't>eat on a very
regular basis. Then I remind her that her baby needs >to double his or her
weight in 6 months-something I strongly doubt>she wants to do herself! Add
to that the fact that baby's tummy is>only about the size of its fist, and I
have yet to have a mom who>doesn't indicate that she understands why baby
seems to be eating"so often."
Great points to use! Thanks for sharing these ideas.
Anna Swisher
LLL Leader
Austin, TX
***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|