Dear friends,

Does it somehow connected with the new AAP SIDS guidelines (i.e. that it 
is dangerous for baby to sleep through the night)? Can it be that it 
simply became risky to advocate sleep training for young babies because of 
possible lawsuits? How do you think?
I became curious because of people, who used those methods,  sometimes 
begin to advocate sleep training on local parenting boards here. I think 
this change of position will be a nice argument against those practices.

Sincerely yours, 
Victoria Nesterova,
bf supporter, Kiev, Ukraine 

-----Original Message-----
From: Lactation Information and Discussion 
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Pat Young
Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2005 3:15 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Ferber revises stance on cry-it-out

I heard him on TV this am and basically what he said was that people have 
mis-interpreted what he said and what he meant over the past 20 years. 
Basically he is saying you need to know your baby and your baby's cues. 
There is no cookie cutter way to do this :-)  Pat in SNJ 

          

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html