I think the point there is that whilst some babies need supplementation, 
they never 'need' formula.  They need human milk, and then, If All Else 
Fails, they should move down to 4th choice - formula.

"Needing supplementation" = "Needing formula" is doing the formula 
companies' work for them.

"Needing supplementation" = "Needing mother's milk" either from that 
mother, or another one, is the pathway we need to keep in the public 
perception.  :-)

Morgan Gallagher



On 26/10/2010 20:17, stillberatung bremen wrote:
> hi all,
>
> maybe i just don't get it but:
> what has raw cows milk to do with the subject?
> infants should not be given raw animal milk. and if it's powdered,
> it's no longer raw anyway.
> and btw:
> there _are_ children out there who need to be supplemented with formula.
> if i needed to supplement one of my kids, i'd rather have organic
> formula from an "independent" source than conventional formula from
> nestle.
>
> just my 2cts,
>
> nina
>

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome