Hi Liz and all,
This is the first I have heard that AMEDA was not in compliance? Til now I think we were under the impression here that AMEDA indeed was still the only (if not one of the only) companies who were always and still are compliant.

Ellen shein, IBCLC LLLI
Tel Aviv

             ***********************************************

Date:    Tue, 7 Feb 2012 20:09:19 -0500
From:    Elizabeth Brooks <[log in to unmask]>
Subject: Re: Change in Ameda's code compliance?

Becky, I too was surprised that so little has been publicly discussed about
this corporation's move to divest its WHO-Code-covered product line,
bringing it back into (apparent) Code compliance after bottles and teats
were again being marketed after a several-year hiatus.  Heaven knows there
was plenty of fur flying and finger pointing when they initially moved to
re-market the bottles and teats.

I say apparent Code compliance because their January press release
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/18/idUS209894+18-Jan-2012+BW20120118
says the deal is subject to regulatory approvals, which were to be
completed by the end of Jan 2012.  I do not know if all the t's have been
crossed and i's dotted yet.
-- 
Liz Brooks JD IBCLC FILCA
Wyndmoor, PA, USA

             ***********************************************
***************************************

             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome