LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Cathy Liles <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 18 Feb 2000 01:41:14 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Thanks for the comments from Kathy and Barbara on this issue. I think we
tend to forget that there are varying strengths of evidence and all are
valid. They range from the strongest- a prospective case controlled study to
the weakest- an individual case report, but just because it may be weak in
the continuum of evidence does not mean it is not valuable. Published (in a
reputable journal) cases which have undergone the scrutiny of peer review
are a little stronger than relation via  the net and JHL would love to
receive such submissions for consideration. The value of clinical
experience, especially in an area that is un-researched or under-researched,
cannot be ignored and the new publication "Current Issues in Clinical
Lactation" is a welcome addition to the evidence on which we base our
practice. Cathy Liles

             ***********************************************
The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(TM)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2