LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Sara Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:34:25 +0200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (51 lines)
Hello everyone,

I feel like I', putting a spanner in the works, but today I found the
following article. I've had a quick wiz through it and it IS NOT saying that
HM does not protect against infection in VLBW premies, but that the research
is flawed / bad-qualities. It is a good article for anyone wanting more
insight into the pitfalls of doing bf research. Hopefully some research
groups will read this and do a well-powered study!

groetjes

Sara Bernard BSc (biology)
The Netherlands

Does human milk reduce infection rates in preterm infants? A systematic
review
A de Silva1, P W Jones2 and S A Spencer1
1 Neonatology Unit, University Hospital of North Staffordshire, Stoke on
Trent, UK
2 School of Computing and Mathematics, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK
Correspondence to:
Dr S A Spencer
Neonatal Unit, University Hospital of North, Staffordshire, Newcastle Road,
Stoke-on-Trent ST4 6QG, UK; [log in to unmask]
One of the reasons for advocating human milk (HM) feeding for preterm
infants is the belief that this provides the infant with a degree of
protection from infection. Providing fresh HM for such infants is
challenging for mothers and staff, and consequently it is important that its
benefits are rigorously evaluated. Therefore a systematic review was
undertaken to assess all publications concerned with human milk feeding and
infection in very low birth weight (VLBW) preterm infants. Nine studies—six
cohort and three randomised controlled trials (RCT)—were assessed using
predefined criteria. Methodological problems included poor study design,
inadequate sample size, failure to adjust for confounding variables, and
inadequate definitions of HM feeding and outcome measures. In conclusion,
the advantage of HM in preventing infection in preterm, (VLBW) infants is
not proven by the existing studies. Recommendations are made regarding the
methodology required for further study of this important topic.

             ***********************************************

To temporarily stop your subscription: set lactnet nomail
To start it again: set lactnet mail (or digest)
To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
All commands go to [log in to unmask]

The LACTNET mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software together with L-Soft's LSMTP(R)
mailer for lightning fast mail delivery. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2