LACTNET Archives

Lactation Information and Discussion

LACTNET@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
My Review: Domperidone Article in JHL February 2055
From:
"Frank J. Nice" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Lactation Information and Discussion <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 23 Jan 2015 00:16:35 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines) 
Here is my short review which is far better than the review just published on domperidone in the JHL article:95% of article appears to support its use, and then just one paragraph in the Conclusion covers all of the cardiac studies, and the authors conclude that its use is "worrisome".
To me, it is biased data in = biased conclusion out.
How could JHL let this article in its final form get through to be published?
Then again, what else could we expect from four breastfeeding naïve PharmDs (aka, pharmacists)?
I am saddened and frustrated that pharmacists can produce and then have articles published like this.





Frank J. Nice, RPh, DPA, CPHP



 		 	   		  
             ***********************************************

Archives: http://community.lsoft.com/archives/LACTNET.html
To reach list owners: [log in to unmask]
Mail all list management commands to: [log in to unmask]
COMMANDS:
1. To temporarily stop your subscription write in the body of an email: set lactnet nomail
2. To start it again: set lactnet mail
3. To unsubscribe: unsubscribe lactnet
4. To get a comprehensive list of rules and directions: get lactnet welcome

ATOM RSS1 RSS2