HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 14:46:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
In a message dated 10/14/2006 11:54:35 PM Mountain Daylight Time, 
[log in to unmask] writes:

> I think the major reason we are not relevant to others is because 
> anthropologists and archaeologists only like to write to themselves.  It is 
> much easier to write a very fine paper on how gender is reflected in the 
> archaeological record, than it is to transform that information into 
> knowledge and explain it to the public or a professional from another field. 
> 
> Its hard work and few need to make the effort to keep their job.  In fact, 
> writing for others, especially the public, is no road to tenure.  Until we 
> make a concerted effort to write for others, it is difficult to address 
> these other questions as to why we are not relevant.
> 
> Darby
> 

Very well said, Darby.

Mike

ATOM RSS1 RSS2