HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Mime-Version:
1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Sender:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
X-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 29 Oct 2012 14:59:53 -0400
Reply-To:
HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
"Lyle E. Browning" <[log in to unmask]>
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
8bit
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
The many and varied agricultural magazines of the 19th century have articles on them. Also, when googling them, be aware that the Brits have called them mole drains.

From what I've seen, they're laid out at anywhere from 50 foot centers on up to 150 feet. Depth is sub-plowzone obviously.

Lyle Browning


On Oct 29, 2012, at 2:06 PM, Pentney, Sandra wrote:

> Has anyone done any research on agricultural drainage tiles? How much of an agricultural field is disturbed from the installation of drainage tile? Are/were the tiles installed at an average depth? Does anyone know of any reference material on this topic?
> 
> Thank you,
> Sandra.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2