HISTARCH Archives

HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY

HISTARCH@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: Artifact Identification
From:
Jan Selmer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
[log in to unmask]
Date:
Thu, 3 Mar 2016 09:21:59 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines) 
Or of wood...

Am 03.03.2016 um 09:20 schrieb Jan Selmer:
> Known at least since roman times, made of bone then:
> http://heritage.warwickshire.gov.uk/museum-service/collections/looking-good/
> 
> Am 01.03.2016 um 19:15 schrieb Leslie C. Stewart-Abernathy:
>> Yes, a lice comb, sometimes euphemistically referred to as a "baby's comb." Goodyear made them of  hard rubber at least as early as the 1850s. Usually only the spines are left. There must be 1000s of broken-off comb teeth around somewhere!
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: HISTORICAL ARCHAEOLOGY [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Kayla Marciniszyn
>> Sent: Tuesday, March 01, 2016 10:36 AM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: Artifact Identification
>>
>> Hi Matt, 
>>
>> Thank you so much! I'm taking a look at the report now! What a great project! 
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Kayla Marciniszyn
>> Archaeology Collections Assistant
>> Santa Clara University 
>>
>

ATOM RSS1 RSS2