CLASSICAL Archives

Moderated Classical Music List

CLASSICAL@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deryk Barker <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 3 Sep 1999 17:54:28 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
Donald Satz ([log in to unmask]) wrote:

>Sometimes, I have the feeling that a list member does not like a particular
>work, and the problem is which versions have been listened to.  It's
>probably best to listen to the most outstanding recordings of a work before
>concluding it's not up to speed.  I don't have anything against Haitink's
>or Masur's 9th, but they are well below the best available.

Couldn't agree more, which is why I asked the question.  Problem is, many
of the "big name" modern versions of standard repertoire really are 2nd
rate (or worse) and do nobody any favours.

Deryk Barker
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2