BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Aug 2002 07:52:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=us-ascii
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
Richard Yarnell wrote:
>
> Who's going to research it?  Nothing in for the Drug companies.  Not much
> in it for the medical profession at all.  That kind of study takes
> funding, is complex, and in the US, not much "unfettered" money is
> cirulating in academia these days.
>

Actually, you have it right here, with beekeepers. If there are
beekeepers with pollen allergies and they eat their own honey, then the
use of honey for treating allergies is suspect. If no beekeepers have
pollen allergies, then it works just fine.

I have many people ask me for my unheated honey to treat allergies. But
I note that it has done nothing when it comes to ragweed and me.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Me

ATOM RSS1 RSS2