BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 25 Jan 2013 07:59:34 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
>Don't you think the way they reported was significant?  Don't you think
they would have been shouting to the skies if any appreciable level of
contamination had been detected?  The report would seem to be aimed at
raising the blood pressure of it's readership and the way it's reported
seems designed to use whatever evidence is available to do that.   Just a
thought.

I agree with you Mike.  I asked one of the provincial apiarists for info at
Hershey, but he was adamant about not sharing any information.  I feel that
the press release was premature until they can cite actual data.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2