BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Date:
Fri, 29 Jan 2016 23:29:56 +0000
Reply-To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
MIME-Version:
1.0
Message-ID:
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
quoted-printable
Sender:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
From:
Christina Wahl <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (11 lines)
JB:  Why only one answer if we have as many beekeeping as localities are? Isn't each beekeeping local?

Juanse, relative to the question why is one group of beekeepers "right" (saying ground truthing proves neonics are OK) while another is "wrong" (they think neonics harm their bees).  I think you are exactly right.  All beekeeping is local, there are good beekeepers, poor beekeepers, new beekeepers, experienced ones, and every kind in-between....some who can predict the weather, some who can increase their colonies while all their buddies are losing colonies....and still, all beekeeping is local.  Not everyone has their colonies in the same place or places.  Results may vary.  And they do!

Christina

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2