BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Condense Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Content-Transfer-Encoding:
7bit
Sender:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Subject:
From:
Tom Elliott <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 27 Jan 1997 18:54:09 -0900
Content-Type:
text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
MIME-Version:
1.0
Reply-To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
Dave Black wrote:
 
> Would anyone agree that this (surviving untreated) is not the criterion
> for success. Surely we would want to monitor the mite population. How
> could this be estimated without using a chemical knockdown and stopping
> the trial ?
 
I would agree that colonies surviving and remaining healthy is exactly the
criterion for success.  In the process of developing such bees monitoring
representative colonies would be needed.  But, that is only for the purpose
of study.  Beekeepers only want healthy colonies.
 
Tom Elliott

ATOM RSS1 RSS2